Posts by drake

0 votes

Yes, fermented sea water can be given to livestock. Do not give it if it is clumpy or smells rotten.

  • drake answered 2 weeks ago
0 votes
In reply to: Azolla Farming

Azolla is a water based fern. One thing I have noticed about it is that it will put a little droplet of water above it to act as a lens to concentrate sunlight and will also use its deep roots in the water below to handle the extra heat as a cooling system, which I surmise is how it is able to grow so quickly.

Most azolla will just grow great with fish in the pond below that will create manure in a sort of aquaponics type of situation, but the fish can also nibble on its roots which can slow growth. So if you want to grow without fish then I suggest adding the Leaf Formula to the water on a weekly basis. This can be much more dilute than the usual ratios used for plants as it will float around and encourage other water-borne biology to thrive which will also create nutrients for the azolla.

The key is to get a diverse and healthy biome thriving in the water, and the azolla will convert sunlight into nutrients and the biology will make other things and get a positive feedback loop going. So, when you harvest, I recommend only taking 1/3 of the azolla at a time so as not to upset this loop once you get it going.

  • drake answered 4 weeks ago
0 votes

As for resources, I will refer you to texts by Paul Stammets.

As for what most folks want to accomplish is to have maximum yield when growing mushrooms, so sterilization of some sort is necessary to eliminate any competition for nutrients/space that will be consumed by other species other than the one desired.

I’m not sure if there is any evidence that mushrooms are more nutritious, abundant, or grow faster with other species/organisms competing for the same resources, but if this is a concern, then it is probably better to wild harvest than trying to create similar situations in artificial conditions beside their natural habitat?

  • drake answered 4 weeks ago
0 votes

I don’t think there is any way to hack the dilution ratios as recommended, otherwise that would be the recommended application/dilution rate. We are always converging toward easiness and effectiveness.

The reason for this is that the water has to do with the absorption to dilution ratios. It’s like saying that we could make gatoraide twice as potent and it would still be effective cause you could drink half as much. Yeah, not so much. You would find it way too salty and not nearly as hydrating in its effect. Similar situation here.

Also, with spraying 25gal/acre is a light mist. In practice it really covers the plants very well with no drips. At application rates below that, there will be difficulty getting the solution to maximize the surface area available for absorption.

Another way to think about this is “can i just double the nutrient density of my food and eat half as much?”. Probably not, because your intestines and digestive system can only get so much out of the food through the digestive process, and most likely you will be taking big dumps with a lot of extra nutrients in there, and no perceivable benefit to yourself besides you are still hungry. Though this does not quite really apply because our current commercially available food is much lower below the natural nutrient density per volume, so some benefit probably would be realized by concentrating more nutrient density at this point. However realize that the KNF solutions are already concentrated, so not diluting them is not nearly as analogous in this example. ie. concentrating a concentrate vs concentrating a dilute.

  • drake answered 4 weeks ago
1 vote

pH has little to do with soil fertility, ie “rich vs poor”. Plants and the microbes they cultivate will change the pH centimeters away from the roots where it matters and your overall (macro) pH may have a completely different reading, so trying to change or influence the macro pH is not a good way to go about managing the soil. What is a good way to go about managing the soil is to ensure there is adequate biology and organic matter/material. With that present, the natural processes will reach balance which enables the plants and biology to thrive the way they want to and reach their full potential in balance, which results in better produce in many measurable ways besides “just the biggest”.

Specifically in the cultivation of blueberries, it makes sense to include an IMO collection done in a blueberry patch (or several) if this is the crop you will be cultivating. It also makes sense to collect in other near by places to ensure that monoculturesickeness will not arise. Applying these IMO following the Soil Foundation Formula annually or semi-annually will also help the biology, as well as foliar applications of Solutions, and adding compost or mulch depending on your situation. Also encouraging a ground cover will ultimately help reduce your need to supplement as the farmer.

It’s not that you are overthinking it, it’s more that you have to approach it with the simplicity of a child. Children think a whole lot, but they are not necessarily polluted by years of complexity. Nature is not complex. Things like chemistry can get us so tied up with complexity that we lose that simplicity. There are many lenses to look at life, some are useful in certain situations. I always advocate knowing more, but the great sages always say that we always knew everything all along.

  • drake answered 2 months ago
1 vote
In reply to: Super LAB

Combining different microbes, again, is not novel. Folks have been selling EM1 which is a combination of Lactos, Yeasts, and Purple Bacterias for decades. This is also a very powerful combination, and when you combine independently very powerful microbes together they will and do work synergistically with each other to produce amazing results. Steve may be popularizing these ideas, but by no means is it his discovery, even if he did independently come to this formulation.

Spirulina is very easy to cultivate at home and with a small starter and a few inputs can be kept alive and grown as long as you maintain it.

Typically when you hear someone “invent” something it is because they are wanting to patent and sell it and thus hamper something that you can easily do at home, or they want ego aggrandizement which only leads to further suffering, but let them thirst for fame, which is liking begging for the blade of the sword.

I do encourage open source sharing, and I thank Steve for opening his work and sharing as he does, much like what I do, and we all need to support each other through peace and positive encouragement.

  • drake answered 2 months ago
1 vote

Soap’s ability to sud (or act as a surfactant) is significantly cut by vinegar, and I find there are diminishing returns of using soap in the Maintenance Formula. A light mist spray at the proper amount of 25 gal/acre will be absorbed quite well by the plants, and soap will only really benefit if you are over-spraying to wet instead of mist the plant’s surface.

In my practice it seems superfluous and an extraneous cost to use the soap for anything besides pest control. I think a better investment is getting the proper spraying equipment to put out the proper doses and making that job as easy as possible to do more frequently than trying to add more to the formulations.

  • drake answered 2 months ago
1 vote
In reply to: IPMO

Well, first off, this is not Chris’ discovery as chitinase microbes were known before he was born, and the cultivation methods of such have been used by several practitioners, again, preceding him, but steve and chris are popularizing the idea, which is great.

I went on a trip to Korea to specifically study GCM (gelatinase and chitinase microbes) in 2019. This was a specifically isolated and cultivated set of microbes that were hugely effective at mitigating bug and pathogen pressure, but also have their own set of drawbacks to use.

Making custom IMO is not a new idea, and what you add to the rice, such as insect frass, shrimp shell, or other materials in small quantities will affect the colonies you culture and collect. One can push the collection more fungal or more bacterial by using materials other than rice, but you will find at the end of the experimentation cycle that true peace comes from balance, and that the way these recipes were given to us is closer to that than most alterations you can come up with.

Keep this in mind and be wary of the ego claiming any invention or innovation, and the folks that promulgate such behavior, including one’s own self.

  • drake answered 2 months ago
1 vote

Water is important, just behind air and sunlight in terms of how much it matters. The main thing with pond and river water is that it is not stagnant, and your nose will know if it smells putrid or gross. Typically flowing water is preferred, because as it flows, oxygen is brought into the water which will reduce pathogens, but also pond water tends to be full of Purple Non-sulfur Bacteria which produce oxygen and will again reduce pathogens. Purple Bacteria are also useful in KNF context.

Main thing is the water is not stinky. If it is, aerating it through stirring, vortexing or bubbling for several hours can tremendously improve the condition of the water and make the water more conducive to the type of biology that we want to cultivate in KNF.

  • drake answered 2 months ago
1 vote

Bird bones are not recommended because of their frailty. By the time they are properly charred, they tend to burn and turn to ash, which is not what you want. There may also be chemical differences, but I do not have scientific confirmation of that. I have talked about the use of bird bones for KNF Structure on the Office Hours at the 43 minute mark of this episode.

  • drake answered 2 months ago
Showing 1 - 10 of 148 results